Skip to main content















MARKET UPDATE

The Economy Keeps Moving. Can Markets Keep Up?

If the third quarter had a personality, it was confident on the surface and nervous underneath. Looking at market performance, the S&P 500 rose 2.3%, the Nasdaq rose 2.6%, the Dow lost 2.3% and the Russell 2000 (small cap) fell 7.2%. Energy stocks benefited from elevated oil prices and technology names continued to attract capital. Smaller companies and businesses sensitive to borrowing costs struggled. The indexes suggested progress, but the experience depended enormously on what an investor owned.


That was the quarter's central lesson. Economic activity and market returns can move in different directions, especially when interest rates rise sharply. Manufacturing orders and business investment have improved, and consumers continue spending despite negative confidence surveys. Investors, meanwhile, have become more selective about the prices they pay for future profits.

The gap between mood and momentum is understandable. Families experience the economy at the grocery store, gas pump and mortgage lender, not the GDP report. Consumers with less financial flexibility face pressures, yet spending overall has remained more resilient than headlines imply. How people feel and what they actually do are telling different stories.

Corporate earnings help explain the other side. Investment in computing, power and industrial infrastructure continues, and AI’s economic benefits extend beyond technology companies. Estimates for third quarter earnings rose as reporting season approached, reversing the traditional pattern of downward revisions. We expect corporate profit growth of 25% to 30% in 2026, moderating to a still healthy and above average 12% to 17% in 2027. Our real GDP outlook remains 2% to 2.5% for both years.

Strong profits do not give stocks a free pass. Large technology companies are investing extraordinary amounts of capital, constraining near term free cash flow and increasing the demand for financing. Those investments may eventually lift productivity, but that productivity must earn a strong return given the high-level investment. Higher rates make that test tougher. We expect earnings growth, rather than investors paying higher valuation multiples, to drive market returns from here.

The market advanced, but not together



Sources: Bloomberg as of 9/30/2026. Information is subject to change and is not a guarantee of future results.


The test for Q4 is whether profits can keep outrunning the rising cost of capital

The cost of capital was the quarter's biggest surprise. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield climbed from 4.47% at the end of June to 5.28% at the end of September, up 82 basis points (bps). Yields rose across developed markets, suggesting this was not a US only phenomenon. The combination of stronger growth and competition for capital are having an impact on interest rates. Foreign buyers also now have less incentive to purchase currency hedged Treasuries, as their local rates in their domestic currencies have increased, eliminating the U.S. Treasury yield advantage.

Today, higher starting yields offer bond investors more income and a greater cushion than during much of the past two decades. Borrowers, on the other hand, will have had a harder time. Mortgage rates above 7% are likely to challenge new home buyers, while existing homeowners are reluctant to give up their cheap mortgages. Credit remains available, but more expensive financing can delay corporate projects and lower their profitability. Our October Speedometers reflected this pressure, moving Housing and Mortgages to red and Credit Demand and Availability from green to yellow.

Inflation complicates the picture. Wage growth has not accelerated in a way that points to a lasting wage and price spiral. Average hourly earnings rose just 0.1% in September and 3% from a year earlier. Yet energy and transportation remain expensive, and the latest (September) CPI report was uncomfortably firm. Headline inflation reached 3.7% and core CPI rose to 2.6%. Consumers feel the price level, not the statistical distinction between high prices and a slower pace of increases.

The Federal Reserve cannot produce oil or reopen shipping lanes by raising rates. It can slow demand and prevent temporary price shocks from becoming entrenched. Following their 25 basis point increase in September, the target range now stands at 3.75% to 4.00%. Officials had signaled patience with their last expected hike of 2026, but the September CPI report shifted expectations toward another hike in October.

Despite elevated CPI and a higher Producer Price Index reading, Fed officials maintained their patient messaging, tempering market expectations for a late-October move. Market sentiment has aligned with our base case of one additional hike in December. We forecast year-end Fed Funds at 3.75% to 4.25% and the 10-year Treasury at 4.75% to 5.25%. Both forecasts carry more uncertainty than usual. Improved energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz would make the Fed's job easier, dampening the effect of volatile energy prices on inflation.

Shipments have significantly improved, but security remains fragile and a recent increase in attacks has elevated oil and refined fuel costs. If hostilities continue for a prolonged period, the progress made could reverse. Alternatively, and a pending tailwind to gasoline prices and markets, oil prices could ease when negotiations resume, which would relieve households and give the Fed room to be patient. We see this as a genuine upside possibility, not an outcome investors should take for granted.


10-Year U.S. Treasury Yield


Sources: Bloomberg, RBC Rochdale as of 9/30/2026. Information is subject to change and is not a guarantee of future results.


Elections can change the policy backdrop, but company fundamentals, their profits and the Fed still shape the market's direction.

The November 3 midterm elections arrive with two things on voters’ minds: the cost of living and data centers. Polls and prediction markets favor Democrats taking the House; Senate control remains less certain, although the odds have also tilted toward Democrats. Polls are snapshots, not outcomes, and are sample collections that sometimes can be misleading. It is highly unlikely we will make portfolio changes based on election outcomes.

What counts more than party labels is whether the election changes the rules for businesses. A divided government may limit major legislation and complicate budget negotiations but it also lowers uncertainty. Democratic control of Congress could bring greater scrutiny of taxes, regulation and infrastructure development. However, the focus should be on whether eventual developments alter earnings and investment plans, rather than which side celebrates on election night.

Global events also deserve attention. Fiscal tensions in France have widened the yield gap between French and German government bonds. So far, this has not become a broad European credit crisis, but contagion could pressure global borrowing costs. Despite higher yields, international equities remain a useful complement to U.S. portfolios that have become heavily concentrated in technology businesses.

Our positioning remains constructive. We continue to favor equities over fixed income, preferring U.S. large-cap stocks as the core of portfolios. We see an opportunity in emerging markets outside of China with an overweight to Latin America to broaden diversification without relying on the technology concentration in South Korea and Taiwan. Within fixed income, we favor income generation with discipline around credit risk, liquidity and duration. Higher yields today create an attractive entry point for investors, but higher rates could impact the credit quality of more risky borrowers.

What could upset our view? Persistent energy disruption could force the Fed to move further than expected. Higher financing costs could slow investment or expose weakness among heavily indebted borrowers. Conversely, an easing in oil prices and bond yields could help housing, improve sentiment and broaden stock market participation without any dramatic acceleration in growth.

 

Stay invested and stay diversified

For investors, the discipline is to separate volatility driven by uncertainty from deteriorating company fundamentals. The economy does not require positive media headlines to expand, and not every asset class will advance at the same rate  or together. A diversified portfolio with intentional tactical overweights and tax sensitive active management remains the best path forward.

Q3 demonstrated that the economy can remain strong even as markets become more demanding. Q4 will test that resilience against somewhat tighter financial conditions, persistent inflation worries and a heavily debated election.



Sources: Bloomberg, RBC Rochdale as of 9/30/2026. Information is subject to change and is not a guarantee of future results.

EQUITY

Earnings Carry a Narrow Market Higher


U.S. equities posted a modest gain in Q3 2026, with the S&P 500 up 2.3%. The index result hid a much weaker market underneath. Roughly 314 of the 500 stocks in the index fell during the quarter. A small group of mega-cap technology companies did most of the lifting..

The quarter had two clear phases. July and August were strong. Oil fell as Gulf shipping resumed, second-quarter earnings came in well ahead of forecasts, and the S&P 500 set a new record in August. September changed the tone. A strike on Saudi energy infrastructure pushed oil back near $100, and the Federal Reserve raised rates for the first time since 2023.

Rising long-term interest rates were the main force behind the quarter's losers. Small caps fell 7.9%. Companies that borrow heavily, lend money, or depend on low discount rates were marked down. Large technology companies held up well. They fund their AI spending from their own cash flow, which shields them from higher borrowing costs.

Sector results were split. Only four of eleven sectors finished higher: Energy, Information Technology, Health Care, and Communication Services. Energy led on the rebound in oil. Health Care gained 5.9%. Industrials lagged, and Financials fell sharply in September.

Value edged out growth, even as a few growth leaders carried the headline index. The average stock did worse than the S&P 500 suggests.

Earnings remain the strongest support for stocks. Third-quarter earnings are tracking near 25% growth on revenue growth of about 12%. That would be the third straight quarter above 20%. The forward P/E ended the quarter near 21.5x, above its five-year average of 20.3x. Stocks are not expensive relative to earnings. The pressure on valuations is coming from rates.

The key question for Q4 is whether the market can broaden. Further Fed tightening would keep pressure on rate-sensitive stocks. If long-term rates ease, the laggards of Q3 have the most room to recover.


Q3-2026 U.S. Equity Performance

Sources: Bloomberg Magnificent 7 Index, S&P 100 Index, S&P 500 Index, S&P 500 Equity Weight Index, S&P 400 Index, S&P 600 Index, Russell 1000 Value Index, Russell 1000 Growth Index, Goldman Sachs Cyclicals Basket, Goldman Sachs Defensives Basket as of 9/30/2026. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Q3-2026 U.S. Sector Performance

Sources: S&P 1500 Communication Services Index, S&P 1500 Consumer Discretionary Index, S&P 1500 Consumer Staples Index, S&P 1500 Energy Index, S&P 1500 Financials Index, S&P 1500 Health Care Index, S&P 1500 Industrials Index, S&P 1500 Information Technology Index, S&P 1500 Materials Index, S&P 1500 Real Estate Index, S&P 1500 Utilities Index as of 9/30/2026. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

INVESTMENT-GRADE FIXED INCOME

Bonds Navigate Volatility, Yield Opportunities Emerge

The third quarter presented a challenging yet opportunistic landscape for bond market investors, primarily driven by rising U.S. Treasury yields. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index fell by 3.51%, while U.S. Treasuries, investment grade corporates and municipals declined by 3.04%, 3.94%, and 6.35%, respectively.

Municipals underperformed and experienced a sharp sell-off during September (-4.36%), leading to their worst quarterly performance since 2022.  Broad index losses across fixed income were fueled by resilient economic data, inflation concerns, and shifting Federal Reserve policy expectations, culminating in a 25-bps rate hike to 3.75%-4% in September.  While bond markets were largely shaped by rising yields and volatility, overall stable credit conditions and structural shifts (e.g., supply) created compelling entry points. 


Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index Yield-to-Worst


Source: Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index, data as of 9/30/2026. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Despite macro headwinds, corporate fundamentals remained robust, with mostly stable outlooks from the rating agencies and healthy balance sheets.  Investment-grade corporate credit spreads widened modestly (6-7 bps) but stayed historically tight, supported by investor demand.  Notably, U.S. investment grade issuance surged to record levels, rising about 34% year-over-year, with hyperscaler and AI-related borrowing accounting for 20%-35% of issuance – a significant increase from 12% in 2025.  While this elevated issuance pressured spreads, particularly for hyperscaler issuers and longer maturities, the market absorbed the supply effectively.  Overall, investor confidence remained healthy despite the impact of rising yields in the market.

Turning to municipals, yields across the curve recalibrated by about 120 bps on average during September and the yield-to-worst on the broad municipal bond index closed out the quarter at nearly 4.8%, or a taxable-equivalent yield above 8% (highlighting a compelling investment opportunity for income-oriented investors and improved tax efficacy).  Peak generational yields last seen during 2000-2001 were compounded by a drop-off in scheduled maturities for tax-exempt bonds and [September] new issue supply that reached approximately $55 billion (YTD gross Muni supply on track for a record in 2026).

These technical factors created “choppy” municipal market flow activity that resulted in tax strategies like tax-loss harvesting.  In the near-term, it is likely technical indicators will impact the market but provide additional yield opportunities if dislocation develops.  Municipal valuations reached their 1-year highs (e.g., municipal bond yield-to-comparable U.S. Treasury yield ratio) and the historic opportunity is likely to lead to recovery prospects as liquidity improves off September volatility while credit quality remains largely stable across most sectors.

Looking ahead, bouts of market volatility are anticipated, with diversification of exposures across the curve, sectors, and security structures key to balancing risks within portfolios.  Capitalizing on attractive absolute and relative yields with prudent issuer selection should help achieve value-add opportunities across fixed income asset classes over the near-term.


'06 - '26 Bloomberg U.S. IG Index
Yield-to-Worst & Option Adjusted Spreads



Source: Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index, data as of 9/30/2026. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

HIGH-YIELD FIXED INCOME

Higher Income Levels, Continued Caution

High yield bonds faced a challenging third quarter as rising interest rates and widening credit spreads offset the benefits of higher coupon income. While improved yields have enhanced income opportunities heading into year-end, these conditions underscore the need for disciplined credit selection and prudent interest rate positioning.

Taxable high yield bonds declined by 1.82% during the quarter, leaving year-to-date returns nearly flat at +0.01%. The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Index saw its option-adjusted spread widen from 270 basis points (bps) at the end of June to 311 bps by September, while its yield-to-worst rose from 7.16% to 8.35%. Despite these higher yields, credit spreads remain relatively tight by historical standards, reflecting ongoing investor demand for income.

The broader economic environment grew less supportive for fixed income during the quarter. Persistent inflation and resilient economic activity prompted the Federal Reserve to raise its policy rate by 25 bps in September. Concurrently, higher U.S. Treasury yields pressured bond prices and increased borrowing costs, emphasizing the dual importance of managing interest rate sensitivity and evaluating issuers’ refinancing capabilities. Credit quality emerged as a critical performance driver, with CCC-rated bonds experiencing significantly greater spread widening than BB- and B-rated securities. This divergence highlights the heightened vulnerability of weaker borrowers in a higher-cost financing environment. In response, we maintain a preference for issuers with durable cash flows, manageable leverage, and robust liquidity profiles.

High yield municipal bonds also reversed earlier gains, with the Bloomberg High Yield Municipal Bond Index declining 5.55% in Q3, bringing its year-to-date return to -1.68%. This pullback was driven by rising tax-exempt yields and heavy new issuance, which pressured valuations. Following this adjustment, high yield municipals now present a more compelling income opportunity for tax-sensitive investors, though risks related to duration, liquidity, and issuer-specific credit fundamentals warrant careful monitoring.

Looking ahead, coupon income remains central to our return expectations. Higher starting yields provide a stronger buffer against market volatility but further increases in interest rates or credit spreads could erode this advantage. Our strategy remains selective, prioritizing issuers with strong financial resilience, sound credit fundamentals, and adequate compensation for both credit and interest rate risks. By balancing these factors, we aim to navigate the current environment while capitalizing on income opportunities.


Rising Yields


Source: Broad Municipal Bond Index, data as of 9/30/2026. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

THE FED

Getting Ready to Hike Again

The Federal Reserve is mandated to keep the unemployment and inflation rates low and stable. The unemployment rate is 4.2% and has averaged 4.3% over the past twelve months (Chart 1). That puts it squarely within the 4.0% to 4.5% range, which most economists view as full employment. With that news, the Fed does not need to worry about the labor portion of its mandate.


But inflation is a problem for the Fed. It has been above the Fed’s 2.0% target for more than five years. Furthermore, it has been trending upward since April of last year when tariffs were added to many imported goods.  Add to that the Middle East conflict, which has put upward pressure on energy prices, and the consumer price index is currently at 3.7%, nearly double the Fed’s target.

Under this scenario, the Fed has become singularly focused on bringing inflation down to the 2.0% target and is determined to adjust monetary policy to achieve that goal. Over the course of this year, the Fed has shifted to a more hawkish stance. In March, the Fed expected the 2026 year-end federal funds rate to be 3.4%; in June, it moved up to 3.8%; and at the recent September meeting, it was elevated to 4.1%, implying the Fed will raise the federal funds rate by another 25 bps this year.

Unemployment Rate
%, seasonally adjusted

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, data as of October 2026. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

The Fed has two meetings remaining this year and is widely expected to hike rates at one of them. Despite the recent firming of inflation, which may warrant an immediate interest rate hike at the October 28th meeting, we believe the Fed will pass on moving rates. That meeting is just six days before the mid-term elections, and that proximity is too close, and a move would be viewed as political by some. Furthermore, by waiting, it gives the Fed more time to review the impact of the 100-basis point increase in longer-term interest rates that has occurred this year. That leaves the December 9th meeting for the Fed to hike the federal funds rate.


Inflation: CPI
%, y-o-y



Sources: Federal Reserve, data as of October 2026. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.


Put our insights to work for you.

If you have a client with more than $1 million in investable assets and want to find out about the benefits of our intelligently personalized portfolio management, speak with an investment consultant near you today.

If you’re a high-net-worth client who's interested in adding an experienced investment manager to your financial team, learn more about working with us here.